Changes to inheritance tax (IHT) were for many the most contentious part of the UK’s Autumn Budget, with plans announced that will add a further level of complexity to what the Office of Tax Simplification already considers to be one of the UK’s most complicated taxes.
IHT is also one of the most unpopular taxes due to widely held perception it represents double taxation. The announced changes relate to less generous reliefs for business and agricultural property owners, while pensions are planned to be brought into scope in 2027.
Although there is a HMRC consultation taking place at present, this is believed to be focused on the implementation of the proposed changes, not a discussion on the policy changes themselves, and therefore offers little hope that these changes will not occur.
However, even after the proposed changes a number of planning possibilities exist, the appropriateness of which is determined by an individual’s specific situation. An expert understanding of the plethora of remaining reliefs can prove highly valuable and as with several areas of financial planning, the early planning occurs the greater the chances of favourable outcomes.
The nearly four months between the election in early July and Labour’s first budget for 14 years on 30 October meant speculation in the run up was bordering on the excessive. This was ratcheted up further by Rachel Reeves strongly hinting at possible tax rises during the chancellor’s first speech to parliament in late July, stating that “difficult decisions and challenging trade-offs” were faced in ensuring the sustainability of the UK’s public finances. This was when the £22bn “black hole” was first declared.
On budget day the top-level figures showed an additional £70bn of planned government spending per year. This will be funded by £40bn from higher taxes, earmarked for improving public services, and an additional £30bn in government borrowing that is intended to grow the economy.